Comment on The Wrong Way To Argue About Assault Weapons by dpmaine

It is immoral to relegate any law abiding citizen to the use of a weapon that doesn’t have the features he needs to defend himself or his family. I think you have lost me at this point. In strategic thinking, there is a concept of a last resort. So how about my personal and family defense consists of: 1. High-capacity hand guns 2. High-capacity light-recoil semi automatic rifle 3. Fail-safe mutually assured self-destruct weapon #3 will trigger if automatically if myself and family members are reasoned to be dead. It works by posting a well known and iconic graphic on the front of my house or property - if you enter and kill me or my family, it won't matter, because the entire property will be leveled. In your reasoning, just forget the 2nd amendment, there is no moral basis to regulate my weapon. The features of being able to level my property automatically is what is nece...