Judge Peck Objects to Defendant’s Form of Objections: eDiscovery Case Law
March 7, 2017 - 12:00am
In Fischer v. Forrest, Nos. 14 Civ. 1304 (PAE) (AJP), 14 Civ. 1307 (PAE) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2017), New York Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck ordered the defendants “to revise their Responses to comply with the Rules”, specifically Rule 34(b)(2)(B) and Rule 34(b)(2)(C), amended in December 2015 requiring objections to be stated with specificity and directing that an objection must state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection.
The post Judge Peck Objects to Defendant’s Form of Objections: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on CloudNine.
Continue reading this article »